$50 DIY vs $450 PRO Acoustical Panels (Worth It?) – Echo & Sound Proofing

▶ Check out my gear on Kit:

(Please note that although I'm a podcaster, I'm not a professional acoustics expert or sound engineer. I did my best trying to test these panels against each other and share the results, but if you're expecting a PRO level analysis, this is not the place).

There are a lot of options for acoustical and sound proofing solutions for recording podcasts and videos, but I was just curious – which works better: cheap egg crate sound panels you can buy on Amazon, or professional acoustical treatment solutions?

Well, let's test and see!

Big thanks to Audimute for hooking us up with their line of Standard Acoustic Panels for this test, which you can find here

Subscribe for more videos about the studio build here at the WeWork in San Diego, California. For more information about WeWork, check this out:

How much does a RUG reduce Echo?:

Free Ways to Reduce Echo for Better Sound Quality and Recording – Podcast Studio Build Out:

Planning the ULTIMATE Podcasting, Video and Live Streaming Studio:

-=-=-=-=-

Subscribe to this YouTube channel:

-=-=-=-=-

Want to learn more about the smart way to make money online and start a successful online passive income business (without ripping people off or being dishonest)? Then make sure to visit the Smart Passive Income getting started page below:

-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
New and updated: "Podcast Marketing in 2020 (Top 5 Podcasting Tips that Get More Downloads and Subscribers)"

-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-

Are you a YouTuber? Then check out Tubebuddy, my favorite YouTube add-on that helps me do keyword research, rank higher in search results, get more views, and gain more subscribers. Sign-up for a 30 Day Free Trial of TubeBuddy here:

Paul Miller
 

  • @TonyCollumtheHOWTOHERO says:

    Obviously I’m going to go with the DIY version, but the pro ones do sound great

  • @NateOBrien says:

    I use $13 mattress foam from Walmart. More bang for your buck

  • @DoubtingThomas333 says:

    Foam density on the DIY was not good. The better panels are just more dense. You can find more dense foam for DIY and much cheaper than the ready to go products.

    • @jayswafford says:

      I was thinking the same thing…1″ tiles would do very little…a minimum of 2″ foam density tiles are needed to dampen sound on walls.

    • @hidjedewitje says:

      @@jayswafford If you are going DIY, you are better off making absorbers with rockwool and diffusers. Foam just isnt a great material for absorbtion

  • @thejasonresnick says:

    Wow!!! That’s a crazy big difference. I do podcasts though in a circular room with windows so I’m not sure I can cover up the windows (my wife wouldn’t like it). Curious your thoughts to help with echo in my room?

  • @richardsummers8805 says:

    I heard a big difference from the Audimute products. They sure cost a lot more though. I wish you’d have tested the 2 inch version of the cheaper foam products. I wonder if they might have been a bit better than the 1 inch? I certainly was not impressed by the 1 inch foam, despite the savings.

  • @timetothrive1637 says:

    To me, the sound difference between the cheap ones and nothing was still much more noticeable than the the cheap ones and the pro ones… although it was noticeable between the two.

  • @HowardLeeHarkness says:

    I heard a lot of difference between the bare walls an the $50 set of panels. Less difference between the $50 & $400 solutions. If I were to choose, I’d go with twice as many of the cheaper panels.

    The solution I implemented in my studio is a backdrop frame with 3 different color bedsheets. Frame was $35, sheets were $9 each at Walmart. Double duty – choice of background color to go with what I’m wearing, and no discernible echo on my recordings.

  • @mattwanders2704 says:

    Hey Pat this reminds me of when I set up my first music school. We had good luck with the cheap stuff on the wall underneath a tapestry FWIW. . . and believe it or not, towels work really well acoustically, so I’ve stapled those under something more aesthetically pleasing too and it’s worked really well on a budget 😜

  • @CoreyCorpodian says:

    Wow! those Audimute panels absolutely helped with the echo. Couldn’t believe there was that much of a difference. Thanks pat, this video was super helpful.

  • @MylesDavid says:

    Great vid! Bouncing through each version worked great!

    It would be really cool if you showed us and talked about what the expensive panels are made of and why they absorb reflection better.

  • @IPASAustralia says:

    I definitely heard the difference. The Audimute panels reduced the echo greater than the Amazon foam… but the foam did work, just not to the same degree. Thanks for taking time to post this vid.

  • @thevisi0naryy says:

    You can make basically the same thing as the pro panels for not much more these foam ones, and they will be extraordinarily better.

    Make a simple 2ft x 4ft wooden frame that is 4 inches thick. Buy rigid fiberglass or rockwool, put it in the frame and cover it with a sheet. I used to do this all the time, it’s extremely easy and you can make 3 or 4 panels for $100. These are the same materials a lot of pro panels use.

  • @attilaflagello says:

    huge difference, the pro acoustical panels are on another level

  • @nandangopan1 says:

    I heard a very good difference in the Amazon panels. Tbh I didn’t really expect it would work that great. I don’t know why he is saying no big difference. The expensive ones were better but not as much. Definitely not worth spending that extra money other than for a clean look.

  • @HolyKoolaid says:

    If you only cover part of one or two walls with cheap foam, of course you’re going to still get echo. I bought two 96 packs of these Amazon tiles for about $180 and covered the walls of my studio. It’s a night and day difference and still $270 less than the pro tiles recommended here.

    If you’re on a budget, you can also fill your studio with chairs, lighting equipment, a desk, monitors, a camera + tripod, desks, pictures, shelves, etc. The more stuff in the room, and the fewer exposed flat surfaces, the better your results will be.

    • @sanyamjain4540 says:

      If you need more i can give you at $150 for 96

    • @sanyamjain4540 says:

      Which have the self adhesive so you don’t have to put tape on it

    • @eyocs_ says:

      your last sentence isnt true, because it depends on the room

    • @OrionBurdick says:

      For less than $20 each you can make panels that perform as well as the expensive panels in this video, and you’ll end up with much better sound because it will absorb a wider frequency range than the cheap foam, which only absorbs high frequencies. And you won’t have to coat your entire walls of your studio because a few well placed panels will have a better effect.

  • @edwrd1990 says:

    To me there was a huge difference between no insulation and the foam. From the foam to the professional wall there was minor difference. It looks like you simply want to feel like you didn’t throw away your money 😂😅

    • @jadegrace1312 says:

      Foam is perfectly fine, it really just matters what frequency the sound is, because the foam doesn’t work so well at stopping deeper sounds

    • @egtalbot says:

      Agree 100%. Those echoes disappeared with the foam. There WAS a difference from foam to professional wall, just not as big.

    • @Hzuuuu says:

      Pretty sure the 450 dollars panels were sponsored.

  • @egtalbot says:

    Listening to this, I heard at least as big a difference between no treatment and the foam panels as I did between foam and the professional panels. Almost all the harsh echo was removed by the foam. To be honest, the professional panels almost sounded too dead – if I envision recording singing vocals, the foam was closer to the sound I’d be looking for.

    That said, none of the sounds you tested were low spectrum. Your voice is maybe high baritone, so there’s a whole range of lower stuff which my guess is the foam panels wouldn’t handle. Really should have compared a wider range of frequencies.

  • @mathewo9209 says:

    For anyone here looking into purchasing acoustic treatment for a home theater or studio, here are a few things you should know:

    1. Generally speaking, acoustic panels are better than acoustic foam, however, acoustic panels generally are made with fiberglass, so it can hazardous.
    2. If you’re looking to treat a bedroom like studio (3.5m W x 3.5m L x 2.5m H), my personal opinion would be to purchase acoustic foam (perhaps from Auralex or another more trustworthy brand), enough to cover the primary reflection points and a bit on the back wall.
    3. When it comes to bass traps, nothing beats acoustic panels, so, if you REALLY don’t want to use acoustic foam (due to pricing, aesthetics, etc) another solution is to use polyester insulation batts and DIY the frames yourself.

    I’m an audio engineer, not an acoustician, your situation might be different to mine – number one rule: Don’t buy cheap foam, these videos are really an unfair comparison.

  • @MrFattarot says:

    The pro panels were better but not $400 better. I’m sure if you bought an extra pack of the cheap foam or even bought thicker ones in the first place you would have gotten much better results for $100 vs $450, but then again, the video was sponsored. Also, a little bit more care could have been taken to at least make the DIY panels look presentable

    • @relnano7707 says:

      he made less noise with the expensive ones as well you can clearly hear it. He just really wanted the expensive ones to be good.

  • @miroski1 says:

    If you have used 2 inch thick acoustic foam instead of the 1 inch, then the result would be much better.

  • >